SMALLVILLE-TWIST.ORG
 
Eureka! -- The Meta-Smallville Twist View The Smallville Twist at YouTube
 

Home Chloisers Speak! Read The Chlois File Ratings Analysis Sign On! Smallville Twist Survey Results YouTube and Copyright Zodana Blog

View The Smallville Twist at YouTube

_______________

 

Pre-Series Origins of Chlois

One of the executive producers and creators of Smallville, Al Gough, has described Chloe Sullivan as a character specifically created for the Smallville series.  This is true.  Indeed, no other incarnation of Superman, in the 63 years from 1938 when Superman debuted in Action Comics #1, to October 2001 when Smallville debuted in the U.S., ever mentioned a cousin of Lois Lane.  Lois did have a sister named Lucy, a version of whom appeared in a Smallville season 4 episode, but she had no cousin.  This is one of many factors that actually strongly supports Chlois.  If Chlois isn't true, then the Chloe Sullivan character is the Ultimate Contrivance as described in part 3 of The Chlois File, instead of a great new twist on the story.

What's more relevant in understanding how the Chloe Sullivan character came into being though, is that Lois Lane was literally in the original Smallville series pitch, and in the planning approximately one year before the series aired.  This fact was publicly disclosed in a trade paper interview.  However, by the time the pilot episode was made several months later, there had been a rethinking of this element.  The Lois character kept her Lois Lane-like nature, but was given the new name Chloe Sullivan.  (Having established this as a fact, it's overkill to point out, as many do thinking they've discovered it for the first time, that the replacement name contains the "LL" within it, and also has Lois Lane with the following letters left over: C, H, L, U, and V.  One doubts the leftover letters mean anything, but if you're bored with Sudoku or otherwise have some time on your hands, you might make something up like "Clark's Her LUV", or Clark's Ultimate Love Veiled Here or some such. :-)).

So while it's true that Chloe Sullivan was "created for the series", she was very much intended to be a kind of proxy for the Lois Lane character.  In response to a question about the similarity to Lois, Gough once said "that's her function".  Before that, in a May, 2002 interview with eonline, Gough said:

"Chloe is interesting, because Chloe, in a way, represents the kind of woman Clark ends up with...

"Allison [Mack, who plays Chloe Sullivan] has really stepped up, and she's such a good little actress.  She's fun to write for.  And she has a different energy with Tom [Welling, who plays Clark Kent].  So we're like... we actually have two girls who have chemistry with our guy!  Usually, you can only get one.  We're really fortunate.  Now, it's just figuring how to play these cards out."

The reasons for backtracking on the use of the character named Lois Lane were primarily twofold.  First, most perceive Lois Lane not ever meeting Clark until Metropolis.  There were perhaps a few "Imaginary Stories" in the Silver Age comics, or other obscure examples, where they did meet briefly but these exceptions only reinforced the perceived "rule".  In any case that "rule" has since been broken to bits in Smallville.  Cousin Lois Lane, played by Erica Durance, was introduced to the series in the season 4 premiere, had appeared in about 20 episodes through #100 ("Reckoning"), and was also in the season 5 opening credits.  An argument that many thought ruled out Chlois is simply no longer there.  Either way, story twist or not, the Lois Lane character has been a regular one in Smallville.

The second reason was that it would have been risky to place Lois Lane, and a new early Ultimate Romance element of the Superman story, on the line in Smallville.  What if the character didn't work, because of the actress or the chemistry, or because the series itself turned out to be weak and poorly received?  That might damage the Ultimate Romance and possibly the then long-planned new Superman movie, which was eventually released on June 28, 2006.

Note that this second reason has since fallen as well.  Chloe Sullivan, the actress who plays her, and the chemistry all worked (as Gough pointed out in that interview), and Smallville itself was successful and well received.  In fact, as described in the next section on the "Ultimate Contrivance", not going the Chlois route at this point is what would do damage to both the Smallville series and the Ultimate Romance element in the Superman story.  Effectively, Smallville has become a victim of its own success with its Lois Lane replacement character.  It's too late to turn back or undo that, without a counterproductive effect.

In any case, the origin of the Chloe Sullivan character is important to keep in mind in any discussion of Chlois.  Her Lois-like nature was not an accident.  It was intended, and in fact she was literally Lois Lane in the original planning.

 [Home Page] | [Previous Section] | [Next Section]

 
01 - Chlois Defined  
02 - Pre-Series Origins of Chlois  
03 - Ultimate Romance or Contrivance?  
 

 

-

View The Smallville Twist at YouTube

__________________

Christopher Reeve Foundation

DONATE TO THE CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION

__________________

 

Unless otherwise noted, all material is copyright © 2006 smallville-twist.org.  All rights reserved.  All material on this site is provided as information only, and is not intended to be relied on for any purpose.  While attempts are made to ensure the accuracy of the information, no warranties express or implied are given.  Accordingly, to the full extent permissible by law, smallville-twist.org shall under no circumstances be liable for any loss, damage, or other claim arising from information on this site.  Smallville, Superman and related promotional images are copyright Warner Bros., a TimeWarner Company, which has no affiliation with this site.  Please direct any questions or comments about this site or its content, including any broken links, to the Webmaster. This page was last updated Saturday, November 10, 2007 at 12:54:47 PM -0700 UT and may the Force be with you. :-)